Britain’s National Gallery is to face an appeal in the United States Supreme Court after being sued for the return of a “stolen” Matisse portrait by descendents of the painting’s subject.
Three grandchildren of Greta Moll have demanded that the museum pay $30 million compensation or return “Portrait of Greta Moll,” which the French artist painted in 1908.
The family alleges that the painting was stolen from them in 1947 during the upheaval following the Soviet invasion of Berlin after the end of World War II.
The London museum, which has owned the portrait since 1979, has defended its position saying that, because it disappeared during Soviet rather than Nazi occupation, it was not bound to return it.
“Neither of the two US courts, which have already heard argument on this point, gave it any credibility,” the museum said in a statement. “If the Supreme Court declines to consider this point no further avenue of appeal will be open to the claimants.”
How do you fall in love with art?
“This is not a case involving Nazi looted art; the claimants allege that the family lost the painting due to the dishonest act of a family friend in 1947, many years before it was purchased in good faith by the National Gallery,” it added.
The museum declined to comment further.
The grandchildren are British-born Oliver Williams and Margarete Green, and Iris Filmer of Germany. They have been trying to gain possession of the painting for eight years.
According to them, Moll’s husband, Oskar, bought the painting from Matisse, but during the war gave it to a student in Switzerland for safekeeping. According to the family’s previous accounts of the portrait’s fate, the student absconded with it. The painting passed through several US art galleries until it was bought by the National Gallery in 1979, two years after Moll’s death.
The grandchildren’s US lawyer, David Rowland, issued a statement saying: “At the heart of the issue here is the question of whether cultural property, lost, stolen or looted due to war, should be returned to its true owners.”
“Most right thinking institutions and persons recognize that war and its aftermath strains civil society to its limits, but when order is restored after war, cultural property that was uprooted due to it, should be restored to its rightful ownership. Sadly, that has not been the case here.”
The grandchildren sued in New York because they say the National Gallery has commercial interests in the US.
“At no point was it ever suggested to us that the painting had been stolen from the family, or that the family had any concerns with the painting being on display here at the National Gallery. We only became aware of these when we received a letter from US lawyers acting for them in 2011,” the statement said.
“After seeing a painting by Veronese in the Louvre in Paris, Matisse reworked the portrait extensively, broadening the arms and emphasizing the curve of the eyebrows, to give the figure grandeur and monumentality,” the post says.
How do art auctions really work?
The case is one of many seeking to recover art stolen or misappropriated in connection with World War II.
In September, a Renoir painting stolen by the Nazis was returned to its rightful owner in the US.
Experts believe many of the discovered paintings, drawings and sculptures — including works by Monet, Picasso and Rodin — were looted by the Nazis from Jewish collectors or dealers.